home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Amiga Plus 1995 #5 & #6
/
Amiga Plus CD - 1995 - No. 5 and 6.iso
/
pd
/
grafik
/
lightwave
/
lightwave-apr95
/
000336_owner-lightwave-l _Fri Apr 14 23:39:36 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-05-06
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave-l>
Received: by mail4.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id TAA18360; Fri, 14 Apr 1995 19:29:36 -0700
Received: from mail.holonet.net by mail4.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id TAA18306; Fri, 14 Apr 1995 19:28:40 -0700
Received: from tenforwd (root@localhost) by mail.holonet.net with UUCP
id NAA27582; Fri, 14 Apr 1995 13:56:45 -0700
Received: by tenforwd.bbs.net (wcGATE v4)
id 42082W Fri, 14 Apr 1995 10:03:02 GMT
From: justin.barrett@tenforwd.bbs.net (Justin Barrett)
Subject: Re: artifacting
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 1995 05:01:19 GMT
Message-Id: <9504140203022471@tenforwd.bbs.net>
Organization: Ten Forward BBS
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Jeric@cup.portal.com responded to Adrian Onson thusly:
-> Adrian Onson writes:>
-> > I have one small question..... What is artifacting?!? I hear
-> >much about it and the fact that the PAR produces considerabls
-> >artifacting, but I have no idea what it is... can someone please ans
-> >my question?!?!?!
->
->
-> This is incorrect. The PAR >>>may<<< produce artifacting on
-> specific image types, but generally produces wonderful images. To ge
-> the more "computerish" the image, the worst the artifacting. (Yet an
-> reason to try for naturalism in your animations.)
->
-> Artifacts are simply errors in the picture, generated by the
-> pression algorithm.
->
What do you mean when you say "the more computerish the image, the worse
the artifacting"? What makes an image "computerish," by your
definition? What would a "neutral" image be? I'm just trying to figure
out where you're coming from. I plan on getting the PAR, and would like
to avoid "computerish" images to (therefore) avoid excessive
artifacting.